Abstracts

Patrick Aloy
 
A network biology approach to novel therapeutic strategies
 
 IRB Barcelona  (IRB Barcelona)

Network and systems biology offer a novel way of approaching drug discovery by developing models that consider the global physiological environment of protein targets, and the effects of modifying them, without losing the key molecular details. Here we review some recent advances in network and systems biology applied to human health, and discus how they can have a big impact on some of the most interesting areas of drug discovery. In particular, we claim that network biology will play a central part in the development of novel polypharmacology strategies to fight complex multifactorial diseases, where efficacious therapies will need to center on altering entire pathways rather than single proteins. We briefly present new developments in the two areas where we believe network and system biology are more likely to have an immediate contribution: combinatorial therapies in cancer and the development of rational polypharmacology strategies.


Alexandre Bonvin
 
High-resolution, integrative modelling of biomolecular complexes from fuzzy data.
 
Utrecht University - Faculty of Science  (UU)  -  Website

The prediction of the quaternary structure of biomolecular macromolecules is of paramount importance for fundamental understanding of cellular processes and drug design. In the era of integrative structural biology, one way of increasing the accuracy of modelling methods used to predict the structure of biomolecular complexes is to include as much experimental or predictive information as possible in the process.

We have developed for this purpose a versatile information-driven docking approach HADDOCK (http://www.bonvinlab.org/software/haddock2.2) [1,2]. HADDOCK can integrate information derived from biochemical, biophysical or bioinformatics methods to enhance sampling, scoring, or both [3]. The information that can be integrated is quite diverse: interface restraints from NMR, mutagenesis experiments, or bioinformatics predictions; shape data from small-angle X-ray scattering [4] and, recently, cryo-electron microscopy experiments [5,6].

In my talk, I will illustrate HADDOCK's capabilities with various examples. I will also introduce the concept of explorative modelling in which the interaction space defined by a limited number of restraints is systematically mapped [7], which allows, for example, to identify false positive restraints from MS cross-link experiments. We have developed for this purpose the DisVis web server available from: http://milou.science.uu.nl/services/DISVIS

References


Elisa Fadda

Are structure-less protein regions really so structure-less? An atomistic view of the architecture of disorder and its functions in protein-protein interactions

Maynooth University, Computational Biophysics, Ireland

Conformational disorder is now recognized as a distinctive and functional trait of many proteins encoded in the human genome. As a corollary of the “one structure-one function” imperative of structural biology, the ability of a protein, or of a protein region, to morph into different shapes, can allow it to play multiple roles by interacting with different partners, thus to expand its functional scope[1]. Conformational plasticity also confers proteins the ability to act as scaffolding units, supporting multi-protein assemblies[2].

In my lab we use a variety of molecular simulation techniques to investigate the structural and thermodynamic principles regulating molecular recognition and binding promiscuity in disordered proteins. In this talk I will present and discuss our recent work on the characterization of the propensity of intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) to form relatively stable, short secondary structure motifs, which, in addition to random coils, contribute to the experimentally observed structural disorder. Within this framework, I will present the case of the p53 extreme C-terminal domain (p53-CTD) and show how these short secondary structure motifs can act as molecular recognition features (MoRFs), binding selectively different protein counterparts, thus conferring to the p53-CTD specificity towards different substrates[3]. Furthermore, I will also discuss the role of MORFs we identified and characterized within the largely disordered DNA repair protein XPA[4,5] and the implications of this knowledge in the design of new therapeutic and diagnostic strategies.

References

[1]       Babu MM., et al. “Intrinsically disordered proteins: regulation and disease”, Current Opinion on Structural Biology (2011), 21:1–9

[2]       Fadda E., “Role of the XPA protein in the NER pathway: A perspective on the function of structural disorder in macromolecular assembly” Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal (2016), 14:78-85

[3]       Fadda E. and Nixon MG., “The hidden structure of the p53 extreme C-terminal domain: Identification and characterization of structural Molecular Recognition Features (MoRFs) by Molecular Dynamics simulations”, (submitted)

[4]       Fadda E. “The role of conformational selection in the molecular recognition of the wild type and mutants XPA67-80 peptides by ERCC1: Molecular recognition of XPA67-80 peptide mutants” PROTEINS Structure Function and Bioinformatics (2015), 83(7): 1341-51

[5]       Fadda E. “Conformational determinants for the recruitment of ERCC1 by XPA in the nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway: Structure and dynamics of the XPA binding motif” Biophysical Journal (2013), 104(11): 2503-11


Franca Fraternali

Protein Interaction Networks in Health and Disease

Randall Division of Cellular and Molecular Biophysics, King’s College London, UK

In the last years, protein interactome comparisons have highlighted conserved modules that might represent common functional cores of ancestral origin. However, recent analyses of protein-protein interaction networks (PPINs) have led to a debate about the influence of the experimental method on the quality and biological relevance of these interaction data. It is crucial to know to what extent discrepancies between the networks of different species reflect sampling biases of the respective experimental methods, as opposed to topological features due to biological functionality. This requires new, precise and practical mathematical tools to quantify and compare the topological structures of networks at high resolution. To this end, we have studied the relationship between structured random graph ensembles and real biological signaling networks, focusing on the number of short loops in networks, which represent complexes in PPINs. By combination of methods for graph dynamics and  algorithms for loop counting, we estimate the relative importance of loops in biological networks compared to random graphs. We show that loops are a predominant feature of PPINs, suggesting that enrichment of their occurrence has a key functional role.  We analyse the importance of these topological modules in relationship with pathogenic mutations affecting the proteins in the graphs and compare these with protein communities enriched in genetic variation in the common population. These comparisons should help in highlighting essential modules to be targeted in the design of novel therapeutic strategies.


Monika Fuxreiter
 
Dynamic interactions and fuzziness in protein complexes and higher-order assemblies
 
MTA-DE Laboratory of Protein Dynamics, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Debrecen  (LPD DE)  -  Website
Nagyerdei krt 98. H-4032 -  Hungary

Specific molecular recognition has long been equated with a well-defined set of contacts, which devoid of conformational and interaction ambiguities. Recently, a more stochastic view has been started to emerge, where proteins conform to multiple structural and functional states in their free as well as in partner bound forms. The latter phenomenon is termed as fuzziness, when diversity, either static or dynamic impacts the regulated formation or activity of protein assemblies. Fuzzy regions serve either as direct interaction elements, or as largely unstructured linkers and tails within higher-order structures may connect separate binding modules to increase their local concentration, exert transient interactions to influence adjacent binding elements, facilitate allostery, or promote intramolecular autoinhibition via well-characterized mechanisms (see also in FuzDB, http://protdyn-database.org).

 All these choreographies are especially relevant for higher-order assemblies that involve low-complexity domains (LCDs) and intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs), which may alternatively either fold into ensembles of structures or remain largely disordered, even exhibiting a fast exchange of conformations in their bound states. I demonstrate that these fuzzy structures are common biophysical characteristics of different types of higher-order assemblies, including amyloids and prions, various kinds of signalosomes, nuclear and cytoplasmic granules, which all defy classical structure-function principles. I discuss a uniform framework, which explains the material properties of higher-order protein structures and the pathological consequences of disease-mutations.


Raphael Guerois

Structural modeling and design of protein interactions using evolution

Institute of Integrated Cell Biology  (I2BC)  -  CEA, CNRS : UMR9198

Protein-protein interactions are of fundamental importance in virtually all cellular processes. Understanding how binding partners coevolved can provide essential clues for better predicting the structure of their assemblies. In that scope, we have analyzed how protein interfaces coevolved through the combined use of structural data and evolutionary information. In a study of over 1,000 couples of homologous interfaces, we uncovered significant plasticity in the way interface structure coevolved [1, 2]. We also identified more invariant features which provided tracks for the development of the InterEvDock docking server [3, 4]. The method improves the structural prediction of protein interfaces, was successfully rated in the CAPRI international assessment challenge [5] and was used in a variety of biological applications. Understanding how interfaces coevolve also opens interesting perspectives in the design of novel protein binders to modulate protein-protein interaction networks.

 

1. Faure, G., J. Andreani, and R. Guerois, InterEvol database: exploring the structure and evolution of protein complex interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res, 2012. 40 (Database issue): p. D847-56.

2. Andreani, J., G. Faure, and R. Guerois, Versatility and invariance in the evolution of homologous heteromeric interfaces. PLoS Comput Biol, 2012. 8(8): p. e1002677.

3. Yu, J., et al., InterEvDock: a docking server to predict the structure of protein-protein interactions using evolutionary information. Nucleic Acids Res, 2016.

4. Andreani, J., G. Faure, and R. Guerois, InterEvScore: a novel coarse-grained interface scoring function using a multi-body statistical potential coupled to evolution. Bioinformatics, 2013. 29(14): p. 1742-9.

5. Yu, J., et al., Lessons from (co-)evolution in the docking of proteins and peptides for CAPRI Rounds 28-35. Proteins, 2016.


Ozlem Keskin

PROTEIN-PROTEIN INTERFACES: AMINO ACID VARIATIONS and HOT SPOT RESIDUES

Koç University, Computational Systems Biology Lab, Turkey


Missense mutations on protein-protein interaction (PPI) sites play critical roles in diseases. Distribution of amino acid variations over interface residues may be related to their classification as disease-causing or harmless (benign). Protein-protein interfaces have a small subset of residues called hot spots that contribute the most of the binding energy. These residues are not randomly distributed at the interfaces but rather form clusters called hot regions. Mutations destabilizing PPIs are more likely to be found in hot regions and hot spot residues rather than energetically less important interface residues. Also, analysis on mean square fluctuations of interface residues shows that hot spot residues with destabilizing mutations generally corresponded to more stable residues which are less tolerant to substitution than rest of the interface residues. After analyzing the classification of human mutations as disease-causing or harmless, we conclude that disease-causing mutations are most likely to be found in hot spot residues.


Emmanuel Levy

Proteins evolve on the edge of supramolecular self-assembly

Weizmann Institute of Science, Cell architecture lab, Israel

The self-association of proteins into symmetric complexes is ubiquitous in all kingdoms of life. Symmetric complexes possess unique geometric and functional properties, but their internal symmetry can pose a risk. In sickle cell disease, the symmetry of hemoglobin exacerbates the effect of a mutation, triggering assembly into harmful fibrils. We examined the universality of this mechanism and its relation to protein structure geometry. We introduced point mutations solely designed to increase surface hydrophobicity among twelve distinct symmetric complexes. Strikingly, all responded by forming supramolecular assemblies, both in vitro and in vivo. Remarkably, in four cases, micrometer-long fibrils formed in response to a single point mutation. Biophysical measurements and electron microscopy revealed that mutants self-assembled in their folded states and so were not amyloid-like. Structural examination of 73 mutants identified supramolecular assembly hot spots predictable by geometry. A subsequent structural analysis of thousands of proteins showed that geometric hot spots are buffered chemically by hydrophilic residues, suggesting a mechanism preventing mis-assembly of these regions. Thus, folded proteins can readily self-assemble into higher-order structures. This potential must be counterbalanced by negative selection, and can be exploited to design nanomaterials in living cells.


Yanay Ofran

"All models are wrong, some are useful": Predicting and designing interactions based on multiple wrong models


Bar-Ian University, Systems Biology and Functional Genomics, Israel


The common approach for predicting and designing protein interfaces relies on an atomic model of the 3-D structure of the protein-protein complex. However, as can be seen in benchmark analyses such as CAPRI, state of the art tools for modelling complexes yield more wrong models than correct ones. We propose a new approach that integrates large statistical models and multiple structural models to predict and design specific residue-residue contacts across interfaces. We show how this approach allows for de-novo prediction of protein function and for de-novo design of new proteins, antibodies and drug leads.


Rob Russell
Searching for mutations & modifications affecting protein interactions and how they relate to human disease
 
University of Heidelberg, Protein Evolution, Germany

Julia Shifman
Cold spots in Protein Binding
 
Julia Shifman1, Jason Shirian1  , Oz Sharabi1  , Michael Heyne1  
1 : Hebrew University of Jerusalem  (HUJ)  -  Website
Jerusalem 91905 -  Israel

Understanding binding energetics of protein-protein interactions (PPIs) at the molecular and structural level is not only interesting for basic science but also valuable for biotechnological applications. Early studies showed that different binding interface residues have various importance to binding energetics and only a few key residues, referred to as hot-spots, are the main contributors to the binding free energy. In contrast to previous studies, we focus our analysis on binding cold-spots or binding interface positions that are occupied by suboptimal amino acids and hence exhibit a potential for affinity enhancement through various mutations. Using both computational methods developed in our lab and directed evolution we study how cold-spot positions are distributed in interfaces of various types of PPIs. We find that in high-affinity PPIs, such as enzyme/inhibitor complexes, cold-spot positions are rare and are usually located at the periphery of the binding interface. On the contrary, in low-affinity PPIs cold-spots are not only frequent but could be also situated right in the middle of the binding interface. In such systems, point mutations at cold-spot positions could result in drastic affinity enhancement, converting them into high-affinity PPIs. Predicting and analyzing such cold-spot positions is not only important for understanding of protein evolution and but would also greatly facilitate protein inhibitor and drug design.


 Peter Uetz

Protein complexes and protein interaction networks in bacteria
 
1 : Virginia Commonwealth University  (VCU)  -  Website
Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Virginia 23284 -  United States

 

Bacterial diversity reveals a colossal scale of genetic diversity and thus molecular evolution. Just the pan-genome of E. coli is almost the size of the human genome with more than 16,000 genes (or gene “clusters”). The genetic and functional diversity across all bacterial phyla is virtually unexplored.

It has been estimated that about half of all E. coli proteins have enzymatic functions (less than 1600 have EC numbers) and the other half are involved in transport, regulation, or cell structure. We have started to study proteins and protein functions across bacteria by mapping protein-protein interactions (PPIs) and have mapped the interactomes of Treponema pallidum, Helicobacter pylori, E. coli, and Streptococcus pneumoniae, using primarily yeast two-hybrid assays. However, we have also integrated data from affinity purification and mass spectrometry (AP/MS) from collaborators, but this analysis has been limited to E. coli.

More recently, we have analyzed the membrane-associated interactome of E. coli. The functions of many of these protein components remain unclear. Even the most well-studied E. coli strains contain genomes with hundreds of open reading frames of unclear function. Across all bacterial species, less than 1% of published protein sequences have annotations from experimental results. With the goal of finding novel functional context for these proteins, we analyzed the conservation of 300+ known E. coli protein complexes across bacteria and combined published interactions into meta-interactomes.

Computational analyses of more than 1,000 bacterial species and their protein complexes revealed how nearly all complexes deviate from the E. coli model in other species. Only 14 out of 285 model protein complexes are fully conserved across 95% of the ~1,000 genomes investigated. We then used a set of more than 50,000 protein interactions, combined into a meta-interactome, to focus on protein interaction conservation outside protein complexes. Our meta-interactome contains more than 43,000 distinct types of protein-protein interactions involving proteins from more than 250 bacterial species yet only 68 interaction types have evidence from than two species.

Together, these methods place proteins of unknown function in the context of well-conserved proteins and their interactions. However, huge numbers of bacterial proteins remain uncharacterized and may yield countless unexpected metabolic and physiological activities. Recent examples such as Crispr/Cas enzymes are only a foreshadow of many useful activities remaining to be discovered.


Ilya Vakser 

Comparative vs. Free Docking in Modeling of Interactome
 
University of Kansas

Experimentally determined protein structures and their complexes account only for a fraction of known protein universe. Thus, structural modeling of protein-protein interactions (PPI) has to rely on modeled structures of the individual proteins. To obtain credible results in such double modeling, the docking approaches have to be tested on large sets of protein models. Benchmarking on such sets showed that docking approaches reliably model PPI at different levels of proteins structure accuracy. The docking techniques developed for PPI were applied to protein-RNA complexes, showing that template-based (TB) docking has higher success rate than the free docking, and the structural alignment significantly outperforms sequence alignment in identifying good templates. Systematic comparison of full and interface structural alignments in TB protein-protein docking showed similar success rates in benchmarking. However, the full structure alignment performed better for proteins with different binding sites for different functions, whereas the interface alignment showed better results for multidomain proteins. Free docking has a built-in penalty for clashes, due to the surface complementarity paradigm, whereas the TB one does not. Thus the common expectation is that the clashes in the TB docking should be more severe, requiring different refinement approaches. The results showed that, surprisingly, the clashes in the TB docking are comparable to those in the free docking, suggesting the use of the same refinement protocols.

 

 

Online user: 1